|
|
|
APOLOGETICS |
|
Why Christianity? By
Dr. John
Ankerberg, Dr. John Weldon |
|
"Every tiny part of us cries out against
the idea of dying, and hopes to live forever."
(Ugo Betti in Struggle to Dawn
(1949))
The Issue of Truth
In our increasingly hectic world, it
seems as if most people have substituted convenience for
truth. Despite the unhappy exchange there is nothing
more important in life than finding truth, nor is there
any more valued possession. Throughout history both the
famous and men of letters have had some interesting
things to say about truth:
Man passes
away; generations are but shadows; there is nothing
stable but truth (Josiah Quincy);
A sincere
attachment to truth, moral and scientific, is a habit
which cures a thousand little infirmities of mind
(Sydney Smith);
God offers
to every mind its choice between truth and repose
(Emerson);
To love the
truth is to refuse to let one’s self be saddened by it
(Andre Gide);
So little
trouble do men take in their search after truth; so
readily do they accept whatever comes first to hand (Thucydides);
Without
truth there is no goodness (Matthew Henry);
For most of
us the truth is no longer part of our minds; it has
become a special product for experts (Jacob Bronowski);
Truth
matters more than man… (George Steiner). 1
If knowing truth is in one’s best
interest, then the claim of Christianity to have the
truth and the claim of Jesus Christ to be the truth is
worth investigation.
For those who do not share our Christian
worldview, why might they consider openly evaluating the
Christian religion?
First, because it is good to do so. As
noted, the honest search for truth is one of the most
noble philosophical endeavors of life. Plato declared,
"Truth is the beginning of every good thing, both in
Heaven and on earth; and he who would be blessed and
happy should be from the first a partaker of the truth."
Any religion or philosophy that makes
convincing claims to having absolute truth is worth
consideration because only a few do. More to the point,
any religion that claims and produces solid evidence on
behalf of an assertion that it alone is fully
true is worth serious consideration for that reason
alone. Only Christianity does this.
Second, the kind of existence
Christianity offers in life is one of deep and abundant
satisfaction, regardless of the pain and disappointment
we may have to experience. Jesus claimed He would give
us what we really want in life–true meaning and purpose
now, and everlasting life in a heavenly existence far
beyond our current comprehension. The noted Oxford and
Cambridge scholar, C. S. Lewis, correctly understood one
of the most heartfelt yearnings of mankind when he
wrote, "There have been times when I think we do not
desire heaven but more often I find myself wondering
whether, in our heart of hearts, we have ever desired
anything else." 2
Jesus declared, "I came that they might have life and
have it abundantly" (John 10:10) and "I am the
resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will
live, even though he dies" (John 11:25). He also said,
"I am the truth" (John 14:6).
Everyone likes a good adventure and, this
side of death, life is undoubtedly the greatest
adventure of all. The reason is obvious. Most people
live their lives not really knowing why they were
born–or what happens when they die. Most moderns would
consider it too presumptuous to claim any final answers
to the mysteries of life and death. But what if, in
spite of all the questions, there really were an answer?
What if Jesus Christ claims He is the answer and
that anyone who wishes could determine the truth of His
claims to their own satisfaction?
Third, Christianity is not just
intellectually credible, whether considered
philosophically, historically, scientifically,
ethically, or culturally, but from an evidential
perspective, it is actually superior to other
worldviews, secular or religious. If Christianity were
obviously false, as some skeptics charge, how could such
esteemed intellectuals as those quoted below logically
make their declarations? Mortimer Adler is one of the
world’s leading philosophers. He is chairman of the
board of editors for The Encyclopaedia Britannica,
architect of The Great Books of the Western World
series and its amazing Syntopicon, director of
the prestigious Institute for Philosophical Research in
Chicago, and author of Truth in Religion, Ten
Philosophical Mistakes, How to Think About God, How to
Read a Book, plus over twenty other challenging
books. He simply asserts, "I believe Christianity is the
only logical, consistent faith in the world." 3
How could Adler make such a statement? Because he knows
it can’t rationally be made of any other religion.
Philosopher, historian, theologian, and
trial attorney John Warwick Montgomery, holding nine
graduate degrees in various fields argues, "The evidence
for the truth of Christianity overwhelmingly outweighs
competing religious claims and secular world views." 4
How could an individual of such intellectual caliber as
Dr. Montgomery use a descriptive phrase as
"overwhelmingly outweighs" if it were obviously false?
His fifty-plus books and one hundred-plus scholarly
articles indicate exposure to a wide variety of
non-Christian religious and secular philosophies.
The individual widely considered to be
the greatest Protestant philosopher of God in the world,
Alvin Plantinga, recalls, "For nearly my entire life I
have been convinced of the truth of
Christianity." 5
On what basis can one of the world’s greatest
philosophers make such a declaration if the evidence for
Christianity is unconvincing, as critics charge?
Dr. Drew Trotter is executive director of
the Center for Christian Studies in Charlottesville,
Virginia. He holds a doctorate from Cambridge
University. He argues that "logic and the evidence both
point to the reality of absolute truth, and that truth
is revealed in Christ." 6
If we are looking for obvious truths,
then perhaps we should consider the words of noted
economist and sociologist George F. Guilder, author of
Wealth and Poverty, who asserts, "Christianity is
true and its truth will be discovered anywhere you look
very far." 7
Alister McGrath, principal of Wycliffe
Hall, Oxford University, and author of Intellectuals
Don’t Need God and Other Myths, declares that the
superior nature of the evidence for Christianity is akin
to that found in doing good scientific research:
When I was
undertaking my doctoral research in molecular biology
at Oxford University, I was frequently confronted with
a number of theories offering to explain a given
observation. In the end, I had to make a judgment
concerning which of them possessed the greatest
internal consistency, the greatest degree of
correspondence to the data of empirical observation,
and the greatest degree of predictive ability. Unless
I was to abandon any possibility of advance in
understanding, I was obliged to make such a
judgment….I would claim the right to speak of the
"superiority" of Christianity in this explicative
sense. 8
The noted
Christian scholar Dr. Carl F. H. Henry wrote a
three-thousand-page, six-volume work on the topic of
God, Revelation and Authority. After his exhaustive
analysis, Henry declared, "Truth is Christianity’s most
enduring asset…."9
Such accolades could be multiplied
repeatedly. While testimonies per se mean little,
if they are undergirded by the weight of evidence they
can hardly be dismissed out of hand. Indeed, as Norman
Geisler comments, "In the face of overwhelming
apologetic evidence, unbelief becomes perverse…."10
Fourth, as we will see, Christianity’s
founder, Jesus Christ, is utterly original and totally
unique when compared to every other religious leader who
has ever lived. In the words of an article in Time
magazine, His life was simply, "the most influential
life that was ever lived," 11
In addition, the Christian Bible itself is clearly the
most influential book in human history. As we will see,
the evidence in favor of its divine inspiration and the
inerrancy of its autographs is formidable, even to many
former skeptics. But if Jesus Christ and the Christian
Scriptures continue to exert an unparalleled influence
in the world, shouldn’t they be considered worthy of an
impartial investigation? If objective evidence points to
Christianity alone being fully true, then it seems that
only personal bias can explain the person’s
unwillingness to seriously consider the claims of Jesus
Christ on his or her life.
A final reason secularist and those of
other religious persuasions should be receptive to
Christianity is because we live in an increasingly
poisonous age. In our pluralistic and pagan culture,
almost anyone is a viable target for conversion to a
wide variety of false beliefs which are far more
consequential individually than Christianity–from
various cults and New Age occultism to solipsism and
nihilism. Philosophies of despair and potent occult
experiences can convert even those who think they are
the least vulnerable: "There is a great deal of research
that shows that all people, but especially highly
intelligent people, are easily taken in by all kinds of
illusions, hallucinations, self-deceptions, and outright
bamboozles–all the more so when they have a high
investment in the illusion being true." 12
In other words, even in this life it is the personal
welfare of the non-Christian that may be at risk.
Footnotes:
1. Unless otherwise indicated these
citations were taken from various books of
contemporary or historical quotations, i. e., Rhoda
Tripp (compiler), The International Thesaurus of
Quotations; Ralph L. Woods (compiler and ed.),
The World Treasury of Religious Quotations;
William Neil (ed.), Concise Dictionary of Religious
Quotations; Jonathan Green (compiler),
Morrow’s International Dictionary of
Contemporary Quotations.
2. C. S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain
(New York: Macmillan, 1962), p. 145.
3. As cited in an interview in
Christianity Today, Nov. 19, 1990, p. 34.
4. John Warwick Montgomery (ed.),
Evidence for Faith: Deciding the God Question
(Dallas: Word, 1991), p. 9.
5. Alvin Plantinga, "A Christian Life
Partly Lived," in Kelly James-Clark (ed.)
Philosophers Who Believe (Downer’s Grove, IL:
InterVarsity, 1993), p. 69, emphasis added.
6. As interviewed in the Chattanooga
Free Press, July 23, 1995, p. A-11.
7. L. Neff, "Christianity Today
Talks to George Gilder," Christianity Today,
March 6, 1987, p. 35 cited in David A. Noebel,
Understand the Times: The Religious Worldviews of Our
Day and the Search for Truth (Eugene, OR: Harvest
House, 1994) p. 13.
8. Alister E. McGrath, "Response to
John Hick" in Dennis L. Okholm and Timothy R. Phillips
(eds)., More Than One Way? Four Views on Salvation
in a Pluralistic World (Grand Rapids, MI:
Zondervan, 1995), p. 68.
9. Ajith Fernando, The Supremacy of
Christ (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 1995), p. 109.
10. Norman L. Geisler, "Joannine
Apologetics" in Roy B. Zuck (gen. Ed.), Vital
Apologetic Issues: Examining Reasons and Revelation in
Biblical Perspective (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel,
1995), p. 37.
11. Richard N. Ostling, "Who Was
Jesus?" Time, August 15, 1988, p. 37.
12. Maureen O’Hara, "Science,
Pseudo-Science, and Myth Mongering," Robert Basil
(ed.), Not Necessarily the New Age: Critical Essays
(New York: Prometheus, 1988, p. 148.
(Excerpted from the book Ready With
An Answer, Harvest House, 1997)
|
|
|
|
|
THE JOHN
ANKERBERG SHOW |
|
Make a donation to
The
John Ankerberg Show
If you have
been
ministered to today, please help us minister to others by making
a contribution to the ministry.
Please enter gift amount then press
"Make a Donation"

CLICK HERE
TO WATCH ONLINE
DR. JOHN ANKERBERG'S RESPONSE TO CREATION QUESTIONS

Dr. John Ankerberg answers your
questions on creation in the following article available both as
a downloadable PDF and broken down into individual questions for
online reading. Click the link below to read:
Does Scientific Evidence Today Show
that God Created the Heavens and the Earth? And What Does the Bible Say
About When He Created?

|
Copyright 2006, Ankerberg Theological Research Institute |