[Editor’s note: In June 1990 The
John Ankerberg Show taped a series of interviews with men from several
branches of the sciences regarding the evidence for creation. For
technical reasons we were unable to air these interview. Nevertheless,
we have decided to release portions of these interviews in a series of
articles so you could read the arguments that were being made at that
time—more than a decade ago.
Considerable effort has been made to quote the
gentlemen correctly. We have attempted to find the correct spelling of
the scientific terms used. However, the reader should keep in mind
that this is a transcription of oral interviews. Mistakes in spelling
and in the technical language should be laid at the feet of the
editor.]
Dr. John Ankerberg: Dr.
Menton, how do genes actually function in the body?
Dr. David Menton: In
evolution we’re interested in not just how you get a new protein,
we’re interested in how you get eyes and ears and giraffes and lions
and tigers, things like that. Of course that’s a very profound
question.
I think all of us a certain scientific faith that
genes have something to do with ears and eyes and liver. But genes
really code for a protein classically, and in its most simple sense we
can say one gene codes for one protein, although it gets more
complicated than that. Or genes can turn on and off other genes so
they can have some dynamically control of other genes.
Not all genes are available to be expressed; after
all, all of the cells of our body contain all of the genes necessary
to presumably make another copy of us. One living cell in our skin
contains all of the genes to make another us. But we can’t have all of
those genes expressed, otherwise, we would have a little embryo
developing or trying to develop in our skin and all we really want to
do in the skin is make a skin cell. We want it to fill up with a tough
filamentous protein called keratin, which is a very complex protein;
in fact it is a whole family of proteins. And we want that cell to die
at just the right time and produce a dead stratum corneum. And if we
don’t produce that dead stratum corneum, which is about as thick as
Mylar film, we would die in a matter of hours by massive water loss,
we would go into shock and die.
So the skin is differentiating to death. We don’t
often think of a functional cell in our body actually becoming
functional only when it dies, we think of living cells. But in the
case of the skin, those epidermal cells differentiate to death, form
the dead layer in the top and that’s critically important to our
survival. But all of the other genes need to be turned off. We must
only leave the genes on that will give us a proper skin cell which
would involve several of the genes. But we don’t want genes that are
going to make an eye or what have you.
The interesting thing is I don’t think we really
have a lot of information on how we produce a complex organ. We know
how we make a protein. We’ll take the most abundant protein in nature,
the most abundant protein is collagen. Now many people can understand
collagen by looking at a leather wallet. Leather is dermis. It is the
deep layer of the skin—not the epidermis, the superficial that makes
keratin—it’s the deep layer. They usually don’t include the epidermis
on leather. And this is made up a tough fibrous material and many
proteins indeed are fibrous or filamentous. And this is one of the
most complex proteins in nature.
Now just because we have a gene now that can
assemble collagen and this has been very carefully studied, and there
are many collagens, not just one, now we have collagen. But is that
going to make an ear? There is collagen in the ear. Collagen is really
the connective tissue of the body. It has been called the excelsior of
life. It’s the stuff in which many of the other cells work. So is that
going to produce an ear, is that going to produce an eye?
I think we all have a certain faith that yes, genes
somehow do tell us how to not only make a fibrous protein called
collagen, but now we have to take this protein and we have to weave
it. It’s sort of like a weaver, who has filamentous thread and now
wants to weave a garment, or the fabric for a garment first, and then
finally when you get the fabric, to fashion this fabric into an organ.
Now we call the fabric itself tissue, and there are
many different tissues in the body and when you take the tissues or
the cloth and you produce a garment, we call the garment an organ. So
starting out with collagen, yes, we can have a gene or perhaps several
genes, that are going to code for a filamentous protein, the most
abundant in nature called collagen. So now you have it. You have a lot
of thread.
But now you have to weave the thread and make a
fabric. And you can’t just weave it any which way, you know. Take skin
and you pull on it, and it makes a little tent fold. And if you leave
go, it collapses. (They say you can determine your age by how quickly
it snaps down. If it snaps down quickly, you are a very young fellow.
And if it just sort of sits there and collapses very slowly, then
you’re older.)
We know that the biomechanics of skin—that is, the
elasticity of skin—is, among other things, related to the way the
collagen, this protein, is woven as a fabric or as a tissue. The
collagen itself does not stretch very much, I mean everything
stretches a little, but if you had a filament of collagen and a
filament of steel and they were both the same diameter, the collagen
would be less elastic than the steel.
Now think of this. Our skin, just to pick one thing,
the deep layer, the dermis of the skin, the bulk of the thickness,
i.e., the leather, that is a woven tissue in its simplest sense, of
collagen fibers which themselves are not very elastic at all, that is
less elastic than steel. But because of the way it is woven, something
perhaps rather like a double-knit suit, in fact, it stretches a little
differently in one axis than in another. If you cut a round hole in
the skin you don’t leave a round wound, you get a slit-like wound that
stretches out because it’s under tension differently one way than
another, so like fabric it has a warp and woof.
This woven material needs to be woven in a very
precise way to produce the normal mechanical properties of skin or in
the case of a blood vessel, say an artery, the normal mechanical
qualities of this artery are determined in large part by the way
collagen, a connective tissue, is woven in the wall of the artery and
its different in a vein and of course, muscle enters in there too.
Who tells the collagen fibers (to use an
anthropomorphism), who tells the collagen fibers that, okay, we want a
layer of fibers running this way, and then we want a layer running
this way and a layer this way and a layer this way. That would be a
very simple plot like in a tire. Collagen fibers in bone sometimes run
in this way, looking rather like a radial-ply tire.
The cornea, which is this little window over our eye
that’s really made out of skin, very highly modified skin, the dermal
component of that cornea, that would be comparable to the dermis of
our skin, is beautifully transparent. You can look through it. And you
can look through it because the collagen fibers are arranged in a very
precise orthogonal way; that is, they are perpendicular to one
another. They are a very special kind of collagen, different than the
collagen in the skin and they are hydrated with water to produce this
marvelous clarity. If you disturb the fiber architecture of the
cornea, if you disturb its state of hydration, the cornea becomes
milky and you don’t see. The cornea in fact is more important for
focusing, or as a lens, than the lens itself is. It bends the light
more than the lens does. The lens is just very low in its control on
focusing.
So, I think the important question here for the
evolutionist to consider (and I guess the creationist too) is, are we
really even ready to talk about how we produce skin, or liver, or
kidneys? We’re really at a level of understanding in the molecular
biologies still really focusing more on trying to understanding how
you produce a protein. But how do we now go from the protein to an
ear, or many different proteins? I think that’s the big question.